RSS feed [root] /weblog /concurrency /java




login:

password:

title search:




 


Sun Mar 29 10:15:44 GMT 2020

collections



Even though

private List synchList = Collections.synchronizedList(new LinkedList());

is thread safe, serialize sync List is NOT thread safe for sure. The story is, if you only synchronized the collection, and if we try to get the iterator in concurrent access environment, it will throws currencymodificationexception .

For collection is small, may be making defensive copy http://www.javapractices.com/Topic15.cjp is good. Otherwise, in java5, there is concurrency collection.

reference:
http://jroller.com[..]ntry=collections_synchronizedlist_broken
http://jroller.com/page/ctarrington?entry=java_collections_trivia

Map operation, include use of FutureTask and putIfAbsent() method from ConcurrentMap. - http://www.javaspecialists.co.za/archive/newsletter.do?issue=125

Other then lterate through the elements, adding and removing elements can also be problem, this article document a few good cases about that - http://rayfd.wordpress.com[..]en-a-synchronized-class-isnt-threadsafe/

Samples of using Queue.drainTo() - http://binkley.blogspot.com[..]rforming-fixed-amounts-of-work-with.html

http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/02/28/java-7-transferqueue/

Overview of blockingqueue - http://tutorials.jenkov.com[..]/java-util-concurrent/blockingqueue.html

Simple benchmark - http://java-persistence-performance.blogspot.com[..]jvm-performance-part-iii-concurrent.html

Multi-thread behaviour - http://vanillajava.blogspot.com[..]hread-safety-issues-with-vector-and.html

java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap VS openhft.collections.SharedHashMap - http://openhft.blogspot.co.uk[..]autilconcurrentconcurrenthashmap-vs.html

Why are there so many concurrent queues implementations in Java? - https://vmlens.com/articles/cp/why_so_many_queues/

Why hashmap is not thread safe - https://www.pixelstech.net[..]a-HashMap-is-considered-as-thread-unsafe


(google search) (amazon search)
second
download zip of files only